Latest on twitter:

April 25 2008

Is Nick Denton finally almost acknowledging that Gawker gets 99% of their content from Tumblr?

mascarah:

This would be example #4523485024 of stuff we had days before Gawker tried to fill their pages when they don’t have enough smack about Julia to dig up. This is one of the first times that they cite it—although only giving credit to the flickr not to the fact that it was on Tumblr. Why won’t Gawker acknowledge that they take content from Tumblr users? Don’t we all deserve credit for things we share/discover?

because then nick would have to actually pay us. 

blog comments powered by Disqus
  1. jdel reblogged this from fek and added:
    I wish I caught this before disappearing into the vapid, internet-less hole on Friday evening known as Washington DC....
  2. suitep reblogged this from mascarah and added:
    horseshit. Unless you made a .gif, or designed a site, or took a photograph yourself, etc., anything you ‘find’ on
  3. ttw reblogged this from blakeley
  4. yumwatch reblogged this from mascarah
  5. tylercoates reblogged this from blakeley and added:
    I love the Internet.
  6. fek reblogged this from blakeley and added:
    WORD. Wo-to the motherfucking-rd. Do you people not get it? Blakely, J-Del, etc. They’re on here because - yes, you get...
  7. blakeley reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
    You people are retarded, first off this whole Tumblr thing is a New York CV, NNN, Gawker circle jerk, most of you friend...
  8. soupsoup reblogged this from mascarah and added:
    because then nick...actually pay us.
  9. mascarah posted this